Mexican American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Ecuadorian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Ecuadorians
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Ecuadorian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,307,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,108,203 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.75%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 21.9% |
| Range | 24.9% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 10.5% |
| Median | 12.1% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Ecuadorians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |