Maltese vs Immigrants from Korea Female Poverty
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from Korea
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Korea
11.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Korea Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,421,821 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,882,145 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 48.2% |
Range | 36.8% | 46.5% |
Mean | 10.4% | 11.1% |
Median | 9.7% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Korea by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |