Japanese vs Panamanian Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Panamanian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Panamanians
13.3%
POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Panamanian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,091,915 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,075,399 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Panamanian |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.4% |
| Range | 96.9% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 11.9% |
| Median | 14.9% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Panamanians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
| Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
| Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |