Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Panama Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Panama
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Panama
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Panama Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,193,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,994,048 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 19.8% |
Range | 20.7% | 17.9% |
Mean | 8.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 7.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Panama by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |