Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Cambodia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Cambodia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants from Cambodia
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Cambodia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,161,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,985,132 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants from Cambodia |
Minimum | 5.8% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 45.9% |
Range | 12.2% | 39.6% |
Mean | 10.3% | 16.2% |
Median | 9.7% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Cambodia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from South America (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |