Immigrants from Russia vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Puget Sound Salish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Puget Sound Salish
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Puget Sound Salish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,005,908 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,127,030 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 25.9% |
| Range | 19.6% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 9.1% |
| Median | 7.7% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Puget Sound Salish by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (8.2%, a difference of 0.19%), French (8.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (8.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Portuguese (8.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Hungary (8.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |