Immigrants from Oceania vs Tlingit-Haida Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,831,023 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	1.1%	0.70%
Maximum	36.2%	59.7%
Range	35.1%	59.0%
Mean	15.4%	15.8%
Median	14.2%	10.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.2%	7.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.1%	18.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.9%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	14.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.2%	14.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Tlingit-Haida by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Kenyan (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Costa Rican (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Asia (11.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belarus (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.4 /100 \| #161	Good 11.4%
Alsatians	68.0 /100 \| #162	Good 11.4%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	65.8 /100 \| #163	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	65.0 /100 \| #164	Good 11.5%
Arabs	64.7 /100 \| #165	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	62.8 /100 \| #166	Good 11.5%
Kenyans	60.2 /100 \| #167	Good 11.6%
Tlingit-Haida	59.1 /100 \| #168	Average 11.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	58.3 /100 \| #169	Average 11.6%
Costa Ricans	57.9 /100 \| #170	Average 11.6%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	56.4 /100 \| #171	Average 11.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	54.2 /100 \| #172	Average 11.7%
Immigrants \| Syria	53.4 /100 \| #173	Average 11.7%