Immigrants from Oceania vs Scotch-Irish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Scotch-Irish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Scotch-Irish
12.3%
POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
POVERTY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Scotch-Irish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,386,119 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,217,294 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.81%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 29.4% | 63.9% |
| Range | 23.4% | 62.1% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 16.7% |
| Median | 12.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Scotch-Irish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are White/Caucasian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Venezuela (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Chile (12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Venezuelan (12.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Albania (12.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Costa Rican (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
| Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
| Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 56.5 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 54.6 /100 | #170 | Average 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 50.5 /100 | #172 | Average 12.3% |
| Celtics | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 12.3% |