Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,365,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,351,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.71%.
![Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/child-poverty-boys-under-16/immigrants-from-malaysia-vs-immigrants-from-zimbabwe-child-poverty-boys-under-16-chart.webp)
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 53.3% | 44.5% |
Range | 51.6% | 42.9% |
Mean | 16.7% | 15.0% |
Median | 13.8% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.10%), South African (15.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Tlingit-Haida (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are English (15.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |