Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Iran Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Immigrants from Iran
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Immigrants from Iran
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Iran Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,307,529 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,267,918 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 3.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Immigrants from Iran |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 30.4% |
| Range | 31.2% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 15.7% |
| Median | 16.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Iran by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Thai (17.3%, a difference of 0.99%), Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |