Immigrants from Italy vs Cambodian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Cambodian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Cambodians
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Cambodian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,078,093 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,481,907 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.61%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Cambodian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 37.0% |
Range | 18.5% | 34.9% |
Mean | 9.3% | 11.9% |
Median | 8.4% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Cambodians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |