Immigrants from Hungary vs Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,561,492 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,443,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 2.4%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hungary	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	10.9%	0.92%
Maximum	100.0%	37.8%
Range	89.1%	36.9%
Mean	22.5%	18.1%
Median	14.9%	18.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.4%	10.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.6%	25.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.2%	14.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	22.1%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.4%	9.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%
Welsh	88.3 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.5%
Peruvians	88.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Portuguese	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Icelanders	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.1 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	86.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.6%
Albanians	86.5 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Slavs	84.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	84.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.7%
Immigrants \| Fiji	83.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 15.7%