Alsatian vs Japanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Japanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Japanese
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
11.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Japanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,637,162 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Japanese |
Minimum | 3.1% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 11.8% | 45.9% |
Range | 8.8% | 45.3% |
Mean | 7.4% | 14.7% |
Median | 6.8% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Japanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |