Immigrants from Australia vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,877,847 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,787,777 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 38.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	3.7%	3.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	96.3%	96.1%
Mean	23.7%	21.4%
Median	13.0%	18.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.7%	14.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.7%	24.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	22.0%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.4%	14.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.1%	14.3%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%
Swedes	99.7 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.7%
Maltese	99.7 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.5 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.5 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.5 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.4 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Croatians	99.3 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Potawatomi	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.2%
Cape Verdeans	0.3 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.3 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.3 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.3 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.3 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Guyanese	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Salvadorans	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Ottawa	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%