Hmong vs Syrian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Hmong
Syrian
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Hmong
Syrians
20.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
55.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
80.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Syrian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,664,746 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,305,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Syrian |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 53.3% | 41.6% |
Range | 50.7% | 40.9% |
Mean | 22.5% | 22.6% |
Median | 20.9% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 29.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Syrians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Fijian (20.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Czechoslovakian (20.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Belgian (19.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (19.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and Central American (19.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (19.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Yugoslavian (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (19.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 19.7% |
Syrians | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 19.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 79.7 /100 | #151 | Good 19.8% |
Yugoslavians | 79.0 /100 | #152 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Japan | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 19.8% |
Hungarians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 19.8% |
Danes | 75.5 /100 | #157 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 19.8% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 19.8% |
Pakistanis | 74.1 /100 | #160 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 74.1 /100 | #161 | Good 19.8% |
French Canadians | 73.0 /100 | #162 | Good 19.9% |
Malaysians | 72.7 /100 | #163 | Good 19.9% |
Central Americans | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 19.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 69.3 /100 | #165 | Good 19.9% |
Belgians | 69.1 /100 | #166 | Good 19.9% |
Czechoslovakians | 61.8 /100 | #167 | Good 20.0% |
Fijians | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 20.0% |
Hmong | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 20.0% |