Guyanese vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,314,590 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,543,811 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 2.9%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guyanese	Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Minimum	1.2%	0.94%
Maximum	41.2%	41.7%
Range	39.9%	40.8%
Mean	18.6%	18.3%
Median	16.6%	17.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.3%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.3%	21.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.0%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.8%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	7.7%

Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Iroquois (19.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Ottawa (19.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from Ghana (19.4%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Salvadoran (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Alsatian (19.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.4 /100 \| #246	Tragic 19.0%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.3 /100 \| #247	Tragic 19.0%
Salvadorans	0.3 /100 \| #248	Tragic 19.0%
Alsatians	0.3 /100 \| #249	Tragic 19.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.2 /100 \| #250	Tragic 19.2%
French American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #251	Tragic 19.2%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	0.2 /100 \| #252	Tragic 19.3%
Liberians	0.2 /100 \| #253	Tragic 19.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.2 /100 \| #254	Tragic 19.3%
Ecuadorians	0.2 /100 \| #255	Tragic 19.3%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.2 /100 \| #256	Tragic 19.3%
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #257	Tragic 19.4%
Potawatomi	0.2 /100 \| #258	Tragic 19.4%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #259	Tragic 19.4%
Shoshone	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.4%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.5%
Ottawa	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.5%
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.6%
Guyanese	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.6%