Estonian vs Immigrants from Sweden Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,063,894 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,746,635 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.3%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Estonian	Immigrants from Sweden
Minimum	1.7%	6.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	98.3%	93.4%
Mean	16.6%	18.9%
Median	12.0%	13.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.4%	10.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.4%	16.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.0%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.0%	21.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.8%	20.7%

Demographics Similar to Estonians and Immigrants from Sweden by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Croatian (14.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%