English vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
English
Pakistani
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
English
Pakistanis
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
93.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,080,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.87%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.2% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 26.1% | 22.3% |
| Median | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.3% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.3% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.1% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to English and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Belgian (14.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (14.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (14.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |