Slavic vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Slavic
Pakistani
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Slavs
Pakistanis
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,968,300 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 85.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 83.5% | 95.7% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 22.3% |
| Median | 15.7% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.4% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are New Zealander (15.3%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.3%, a difference of 0.73%), Welsh (15.3%, a difference of 0.77%), Peruvian (15.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and Immigrants from Spain (15.3%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Albanians | 88.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 87.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 87.2 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.3% |
| Welsh | 87.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.3% |
| New Zealanders | 86.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.3% |
| Slavs | 84.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.4% |