Yup'ik vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Laotian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Laotians
24.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,797,465 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 24.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,108,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 72.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Laotian |
| Minimum | 6.4% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 69.9% | 90.3% |
| Range | 63.5% | 89.9% |
| Mean | 28.9% | 18.2% |
| Median | 24.1% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.2% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.6% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 15.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Black/African American (24.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Apache (24.5%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (24.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Dominican (24.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Sioux (25.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |