Czech vs Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Hawaiian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Hawaiians
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 0.58%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 80.9% | 45.0% |
| Range | 74.1% | 40.5% |
| Mean | 29.6% | 23.0% |
| Median | 25.3% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |