Czech vs American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Americans
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,828,526 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 24.5%, a difference of 16.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | American |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 80.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 74.1% | 93.8% |
| Mean | 29.6% | 39.7% |
| Median | 25.3% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 42.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 20.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 20.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.080%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and African (24.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |