Chippewa vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chippewa
Slavic
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Chippewa
Slavs
25.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
84.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,620,289 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464 and weighted average of 25.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,076,225 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 31.7%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Slavic |
Minimum | 7.5% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.5% | 98.0% |
Mean | 37.8% | 29.6% |
Median | 29.4% | 21.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.7% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.2% | 40.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.5% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.8% | 22.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 22.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Somalia (25.7%, a difference of 0.65%), Cajun (25.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Houma (26.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Apache (26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and Native/Alaskan (25.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 25.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 25.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 25.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 25.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 25.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 26.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pennsylvania German (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Russians | 91.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Austrians | 90.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 19.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 88.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 19.6% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 19.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 85.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 19.7% |
Panamanians | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 19.7% |
Slavs | 84.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 84.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 19.7% |
Canadians | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 83.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Austria | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 81.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 19.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 19.7% |
Syrians | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 19.8% |