Chippewa vs Creek Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Creek
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Creek
15.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Creek Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,014,776 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,440,498 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.70%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Creek |
| Minimum | 8.1% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 71.1% | 51.4% |
| Range | 63.0% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 24.2% | 19.4% |
| Median | 19.7% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.1% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Creek by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are African (15.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (15.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |