Chilean vs Spanish American Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Spanish American Indian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Spanish American Indians
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Spanish American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,919,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,838,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Spanish American Indian |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 69.8% | 52.6% |
| Range | 66.0% | 50.3% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 13.4% |
| Median | 13.1% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Spanish American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Argentinean (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Uruguayan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (12.0%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |