Chickasaw vs Irish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Irish
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Irish
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Irish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,205,083 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 30.4%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Irish |
Minimum | 3.3% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.7% | 96.2% |
Mean | 27.0% | 30.9% |
Median | 23.7% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 35.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 31.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Irish by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (15.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |