Cheyenne vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Yugoslavian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Cheyenne
Yugoslavians
25.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,373,873 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 25.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,204,208 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 62.3%.
![Cheyenne vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/child-poverty-boys-under-16/cheyenne-vs-yugoslavians-child-poverty-boys-under-16-chart.webp)
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cheyenne | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 12.2% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.0% |
Range | 87.8% | 57.6% |
Mean | 41.8% | 16.6% |
Median | 39.8% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.1% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.2% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Hopi (25.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Houma (26.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Crow (26.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Sioux (25.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and Yup'ik (24.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 24.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |