Ute vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Yugoslavian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Yugoslavians
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,204,208 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 35.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 9.2% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 60.0% |
Range | 76.9% | 57.6% |
Mean | 34.2% | 16.6% |
Median | 26.5% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |