Sierra Leonean vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Yugoslavian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Yugoslavians
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,138,697 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,204,208 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 11.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 49.8% | 60.0% |
| Range | 49.5% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 16.6% |
| Median | 15.0% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (17.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cambodia (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Nepalese | 3.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Inupiat | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
| Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |