Burmese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Hong Kong
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 0.96%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 13.9% |
| Range | 28.8% | 13.5% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |