Bolivian vs Indian (Asian) Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bolivian
Indian (Asian)
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bolivians
Indians (Asian)
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Indian (Asian) Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,239,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 48.7% | 27.7% |
| Range | 47.7% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 11.5% |
| Median | 11.3% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Indians (Asian) by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |