Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Northern Europe
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,600,632 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
Minimum | 2.8% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 43.1% |
Range | 28.3% | 42.5% |
Mean | 8.9% | 11.3% |
Median | 8.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Northern Europe by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |