Austrian vs Immigrants from South Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,542,815 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,120,116 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.91%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Austrian	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	9.5%	1.8%
Maximum	50.0%	60.5%
Range	40.5%	58.6%
Mean	21.6%	18.6%
Median	16.7%	13.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.1%	10.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.2%	19.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	18.1%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.5%	15.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.3%	15.6%

Demographics Similar to Austrians and Immigrants from South Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from North America (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Switzerland (14.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.35%), German (14.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Australians	97.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 14.8%
Finns	97.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	97.1 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 14.8%
Jordanians	97.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 14.8%
Northern Europeans	97.0 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 14.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	97.0 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 14.8%
Austrians	96.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| North America	96.6 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 14.9%
Germans	96.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| France	96.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%