Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Serbia Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,529,261 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,954,888 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 5.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from Serbia
Minimum	1.2%	0.43%
Maximum	28.5%	45.0%
Range	27.3%	44.6%
Mean	11.4%	13.6%
Median	11.5%	12.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.7%	7.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.2%	16.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	9.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.0%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Immigrants from Serbia by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Luxembourger (13.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Czech (14.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.6 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%