Alaskan Athabascan vs Potawatomi Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Potawatomi
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Potawatomi
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Potawatomi Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,756,433 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 3.9%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 62.3% | 61.3% |
Range | 61.2% | 58.6% |
Mean | 19.9% | 18.7% |
Median | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.3% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Potawatomi by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (13.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |