Ute vs Luxembourger In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ute
 Luxembourger
 In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Ute
Luxembourgers
60.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Luxembourger In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 60.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,682,986 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 66.7%, a difference of 9.6%.
 
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Luxembourger | 
| Minimum | 19.4% | 50.0% | 
| Maximum | 66.7% | 81.8% | 
| Range | 47.3% | 31.8% | 
| Mean | 51.3% | 66.9% | 
| Median | 53.2% | 67.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.4% | 65.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.1% | 69.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.6% | 4.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 5.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 5.8% | 
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Crow (60.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Paiute (60.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Apache (60.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Native/Alaskan (60.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Menominee (60.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 59.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Senegalese (66.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (66.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (66.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (66.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (66.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.0% | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 66.9% | 
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 66.8% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.8% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.8% | 
| Senegalese | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.7% | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.7% | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.7% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.7% | 
| Brazilians | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.6% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.6% | 
| Nigerians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.6% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.6% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.6% |