Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,700,142 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 31.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,707,763 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170 and weighted average of 29.2%, a difference of 7.3%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tohono O'odham	Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Minimum	4.0%	7.6%
Maximum	100.0%	70.6%
Range	96.0%	63.0%
Mean	46.3%	32.8%
Median	38.3%	33.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	32.4%	23.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	58.5%	39.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	26.1%	16.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	28.1%	13.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	27.4%	13.0%

Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are British West Indian (29.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Vietnamese (29.6%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (30.0%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (30.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.2%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 29.1%