Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Bangladesh In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,700,142 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 31.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,549,433 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140 and weighted average of 30.0%, a difference of 4.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tohono O'odham	Immigrants from Bangladesh
Minimum	4.0%	3.9%
Maximum	100.0%	70.6%
Range	96.0%	66.7%
Mean	46.3%	32.3%
Median	38.3%	32.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	32.4%	22.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	58.5%	38.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	26.1%	15.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	28.1%	13.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	27.4%	12.9%

Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Bangladesh by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Soviet Union (31.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (30.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 0.66%), Puerto Rican (30.3%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (30.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Israel (30.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.2%