Tlingit-Haida vs Cajun In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
 Cajun
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Cajuns
82.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Cajun In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,864,119 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.473 and weighted average of 82.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,688,268 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.290 and weighted average of 82.0%, a difference of 0.44%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Cajun | 
| Minimum | 47.1% | 40.5% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 52.9% | 59.5% | 
| Mean | 79.8% | 80.4% | 
| Median | 78.3% | 82.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.1% | 77.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.0% | 85.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 8.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 10.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 9.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Cajuns by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Micronesia (82.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (82.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Spanish American Indian (82.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (82.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |