Moroccan vs Burmese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Burmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Burmese
66.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Burmese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,807,372 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.563 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,434,629 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 66.2%, a difference of 0.17%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Burmese |
| Minimum | 37.1% | 29.2% |
| Maximum | 79.1% | 86.5% |
| Range | 42.0% | 57.3% |
| Mean | 63.1% | 65.1% |
| Median | 65.7% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.4% | 64.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.9% | 68.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Burmese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are German Russian (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Malaysian (66.1%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Taiwanese (66.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Vietnam (66.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (66.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (66.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Singapore (66.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Egyptians | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Taiwanese | 99.7 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.7 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 66.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.6 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Moroccans | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| German Russians | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |