Immigrants from Thailand vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,722,585 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 38.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,301,649 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 38.3%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Thailand	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Minimum	15.4%	11.7%
Maximum	100.0%	73.0%
Range	84.6%	61.3%
Mean	46.3%	37.5%
Median	42.8%	36.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.7%	31.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	52.2%	43.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.5%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.4%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.3%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Hmong (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (38.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (38.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%
Lebanese	98.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 38.6%
Maltese	98.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 38.5%
Crow	98.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 38.5%
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 38.3%