Immigrants from Poland vs Chilean In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,860,925 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,687,102 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.25%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Poland	Chilean
Minimum	34.3%	41.3%
Maximum	74.9%	84.2%
Range	40.6%	42.9%
Mean	63.6%	64.1%
Median	66.1%	65.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	63.3%	60.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.7%	67.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.9%	8.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.8%	7.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Chileans by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Serbia (65.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Spain (65.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Colombian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Laos (66.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Bermudan (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Bermudans	99.3 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Laos	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 66.0%
Chileans	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 66.0%
Iranians	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 66.0%
Aleuts	99.1 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| South America	99.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 66.0%
Bangladeshis	98.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 65.9%
Filipinos	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	98.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 65.9%
Okinawans	98.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Colombia	98.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 65.9%
Uruguayans	98.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 65.9%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 65.9%
Colombians	98.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 65.8%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.1 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 65.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	98.0 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 65.8%