Immigrants from Oceania vs Ecuadorian In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,520,725 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,862,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.26%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Ecuadorian
Minimum	9.1%	51.2%
Maximum	86.8%	77.9%
Range	77.7%	26.7%
Mean	59.8%	66.7%
Median	63.9%	66.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	54.4%	65.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.1%	68.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.7%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	15.4%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	15.2%	4.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%