Immigrants from China vs Chilean In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,678,998 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 84.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,599,929 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Chilean
Minimum	71.2%	61.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	28.8%	39.0%
Mean	84.6%	86.4%
Median	84.5%	85.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.1%	82.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	85.6%	90.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.4%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Chileans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Egypt (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Bahamian (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Western Africa (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Filipino (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Ukrainian (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
South Americans	95.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	94.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	94.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Argentina	94.5 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Russia	94.5 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 84.8%
Filipinos	93.8 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 84.7%
Ukrainians	93.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	93.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 84.7%
Uruguayans	93.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 84.7%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 84.7%
Bahamians	93.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	92.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| China	92.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	92.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 84.7%
Burmese	91.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 84.7%
Finns	91.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 84.7%
Germans	91.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| South America	90.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 84.7%
Slavs	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 84.7%
Maltese	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 84.7%