Filipino vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,095,508 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.456 and weighted average of 31.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,335,847 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 5.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Filipino	Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Minimum	3.5%	7.9%
Maximum	40.8%	67.1%
Range	37.3%	59.2%
Mean	26.6%	30.9%
Median	27.8%	32.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	22.1%	23.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.2%	36.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.1%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.7%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.6%	10.5%

Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Nicaragua (31.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Yemen (31.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Soviet Union (31.4%, a difference of 0.86%), Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Puerto Rican (30.3%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (30.5%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Israel (30.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Filipinos	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 31.7%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 31.6%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 31.5%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%