Dominican vs Immigrants from Israel In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,586,301 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 31.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,706,928 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 2.3%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Dominican	Immigrants from Israel
Minimum	5.9%	6.1%
Maximum	60.5%	100.0%
Range	54.6%	93.9%
Mean	32.0%	28.4%
Median	31.6%	25.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.2%	21.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	36.3%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.2%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.5%	18.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.4%	18.4%

Demographics Similar to Dominicans and Immigrants from Israel by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Immigrants from China (31.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Hong Kong (30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Puerto Rican (30.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 0.77%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (30.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 31.5%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%