Cuban vs Immigrants from Egypt In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,058,980 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 84.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,437,423 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cuban	Immigrants from Egypt
Minimum	62.5%	53.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	37.5%	46.8%
Mean	85.2%	83.5%
Median	85.7%	84.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.6%	83.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.4%	86.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.8%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	7.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	7.6%

Demographics Similar to Cubans and Immigrants from Egypt by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Egyptian (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Haitian (84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Australia (84.8%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Uruguayan (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Bahamian (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (84.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Cubans	96.6 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 84.8%
Egyptians	96.6 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 84.8%
Indians (Asian)	96.1 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 84.8%
Haitians	96.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	95.9 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	95.3 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	95.3 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Sweden	95.2 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 84.8%
South Americans	95.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	94.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	94.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Argentina	94.5 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Russia	94.5 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 84.8%
Filipinos	93.8 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 84.7%
Ukrainians	93.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	93.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 84.7%
Uruguayans	93.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 84.7%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 84.7%
Bahamians	93.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	92.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 84.7%