Croatian vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Croatian
Ethiopian
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Croatians
Ethiopians
77.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,516,771 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403 and weighted average of 77.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,247,985 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 77.3%, a difference of 0.11%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 42.6% | 55.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.4% | 44.9% |
Mean | 81.6% | 79.6% |
Median | 80.5% | 79.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 75.7% | 75.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.7% | 82.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Malaysian (77.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (77.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (77.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Chinese (77.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (77.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Chinese (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Native Hawaiian (77.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Fijian (77.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Irish | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 77.4% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 77.0% |