Cajun vs Menominee In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Cajun
 Menominee
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Cajuns
Menominee
82.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Menominee In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,688,268 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.290 and weighted average of 82.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,774,457 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of 82.2%, a difference of 0.28%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Menominee | 
| Minimum | 40.5% | 60.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 59.5% | 39.3% | 
| Mean | 80.4% | 83.8% | 
| Median | 82.2% | 82.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.0% | 77.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.6% | 91.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 13.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 10.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 10.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Menominee by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Spanish American Indian (82.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Tlingit-Haida (82.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (82.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |