Cajun vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Cajun
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Cajuns
Alaskan Athabascans
82.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,688,268 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.290 and weighted average of 82.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,811,893 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 81.7%, a difference of 0.32%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cajun | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 40.5% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 66.7% |
Mean | 80.4% | 82.2% |
Median | 82.2% | 83.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.0% | 71.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.6% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 28.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Arapaho (81.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% |